<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KarbonCopy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karboncopy.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karboncopy.com</link>
	<description>Hong Kong&#039;s trusted copywriting service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Grammar Check: Which vs. That</title>
		<link>http://karboncopy.com/?p=834</link>
		<comments>http://karboncopy.com/?p=834#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>karb3003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karboncopy.com/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you had this feeling of defeat before? You thought you have gotten grasp with something all your life until the day your 5 year-old come to ask you to explain it and you realize all of a sudden that you don&#8217;t have the answer. That recently happened to me when I was asked to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you had this feeling of defeat before? You thought you have gotten grasp with something all your life until the day your 5 year-old come to ask you to explain it and you realize all of a sudden that you don&#8217;t have the answer.</p>
<p>That recently happened to me when I was asked to describe when should we use &#8220;that&#8221; and when should we use &#8220;which&#8221;. Here&#8217;s my rule of thumb which hopefully can lend some help.</p>
<p><strong> Restrictive Clause&#8211;That</strong></p>
<p>A <a href="http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/why-commas-matter.aspx">restrictive clause</a> is just part of a sentence that you can&#8217;t get rid of because it specifically restricts some other part of the sentence.</p>
<ul>
<li>Cats that are black often signify bad omen.</li>
</ul>
<p>The words <em>that are black</em> restrict the kind of cats you&#8217;re talking about. Without them, the meaning of the sentence would change. Without them, you&#8217;d be saying that all cats signify bad omen, not just black cats.</p>
<p><strong>Nonrestrictive Clause&#8211;Which</strong></p>
<p>A <a href="http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/why-commas-matter.aspx">nonrestrictive clause</a> is something that can be left off without changing the meaning of the sentence. You can think of a nonrestrictive clause as simply additional information. Here&#8217;s an example:</p>
<ul>
<li>Black cats, which are generally less popular, often signify bad omen.</li>
</ul>
<p>Removing the clause &#8220;which are generally less popular&#8221; will not change the overall meaning. (Also note that the phrase is surrounded by commas. Nonrestrictive clauses are usually surrounded by, or preceded by, <a href="http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/dashes-parentheses-commas.aspx">commas</a>.) Here&#8217;s another example:</p>
<ul>
<li>There was an earthquake in China, which is bad news.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Expendable&#8211;Which</strong></p>
<p>If you leave off the clause that says <em>which is bad news,</em> it doesn&#8217;t change the meaning of the rest of the sentence.</p>
<p>A quick and dirty tip is to remember that you can throw out the “whiches” and no harm will be done. You use <em>which</em> in nonrestrictive clauses, and if you eliminate a nonrestrictive clause, the meaning of the remaining part of the sentence will be the same as it was before.</p>
<p><strong>Needed&#8211;That</strong></p>
<p>On the other hand, if it would change the meaning to throw out the clause, you need a <em>that</em>. Do all cars use hybrid technology? No. So you would say,</p>
<ul>
<li>Cars that have hybrid technology get great gas mileage.</li>
</ul>
<p>Is every leaf green? No. So you would say,</p>
<ul>
<li>Leaves that are green contain chlorophyll.</li>
</ul>
<p>It would change the meaning to throw out the clause in those examples, so you need a <em>that</em>. (Also note that the <em>that </em>clause isn&#8217;t surrounded by commas. Restrictive clauses usually aren&#8217;t set off by commas.)</p>
<p>Hope the above sets you on the right track. Cheers!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://karboncopy.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=834</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

